E-lomake - Notifying suspected misconduct in a thesis

Date (dd.mm.yyyy)

Name of the student suspected of misconduct (Firstname Lastname)

Student ID

The category of the thesis

Bachelor's

Master's

Open UAS

Title of the thesis

The issue arose...

before the Ouriginal/Turnitin check

based on the Ouriginal/Turnitin check

at assessment (the evaluation version had been uploaded to Wihi - finalizing the evaluation report)

after the assessment phase, but before the graduation

after the student's graduation

Result of the Ouriginal/Turnitin thesis check (n,n %)

In the following, point the question mark to get definitions for the concepts.

Type of research misconduct ?

fabrication

falsification

plagiarism

Disregard for the responsible conduct of research appeared in the thesis, or other irresponsible practices detected ? "Disregard in planning and preparation • Failure to request relevant permits, decisions and/or statements (e.g. official permits, data permits, research permits, decisions on the disclosure of data, ethical review statements by ethics committees) Disregard in implementation • Failure to comply with data permit or research permit decisions or with statements issued in the ethical review process • Inappropriate use of research data or materials or failure to comply with research data agreements • Inadequate documentation and storage of research results and data • Inappropriately delaying or otherwise hampering the work of other researchers Authorship-related violations • Inadequate or inappropriate references to previous results • Omitting the name of a co-author who has made a significant contribution • Denigrating or deliberately neglecting to mention other researchers’ contributions • Manipulating authorship by other means, such as adding guest authors or honorary authors who have not contributed to the work in question or by taking credit for work done by ghost authors Disregard by embellishing one’s research achievements • Misleading the research community, research funders or the general public over one’s research • Exaggerating or changing one’s research achievements or merits e.g. in a CV or its translation or a list of publications • Self-plagiarism, i.e. republishing one’s own work without reference to the original publication Disregard by misusing one’s academic status • Failure to declare significant conflicts of interest • Violation of confidentiality in the peer review process • Inappropriate use of seniority and influence Disregard in the RI process • Inappropriate interfering with the RI process or harassment of those involved in the RI process • Delaying or inappropriately hampering the work or career development of another researcher who has submitted a notification of an alleged RI violation • Submitting a notification of an alleged RI violation with malicious intent"

A detailed description of the suspected misconduct.

Name of the thesis advisor (Firstname Lastname)

Notifying suspected misconduct in a thesis

Notification of the misconduct

Notification information

Proceed